October 14, 2023 Annular Solar Eclipse

The Ring of Fire!!

Time lapse movie of the eclipse, with some extra dwell time for annularity.

When I planned our trip to see the October 14, 2023 annual solar eclipse months ago, I planned to see it from Roswell, New Mexico.  As much as I would have liked to have seen it in my home state of Texas, the cloud probabilities were significantly better in Roswell.  And, since the last time we tried to see a total solar eclipse it rained on us, having better cloud odds was the dominant factor in my decision making.

But, on Friday October 13, the cloud cover predictions for Roswell were not looking great.  I made a spreadsheet of the cloud cover predictions for various cities using Astropheric, and my husband calculated how long it would take to drive to each one, and we decided to get up early and drive to Seminole, Texas instead.  We couldn’t find any events planned there, but we did find a nice park.

We got up early and drove to Seminole.  Although we did remember to account for the time zone change for driving back into Texas, we ended up running later than planned, and I eventually had to make a decision as to whether I wanted a complete time lapse movie or a good ring of fire picture – the choice was pretty obvious, and we kept driving to Seminole.

Seminole is in oil territory, and there were pumpjacks in the park, and we could smell the oil – giving us the true Texas eclipse viewing experience!  Alas, there were no longhorns or bluebonnets to make it more iconic.  Maybe in April?

I set up my telescope on my solar tracking mount, set up the intervalometer to take a picture every minute, and let it run.  It worked great, which meant I could enjoy the experience with my husband and daughter: looking at cool shadows and viewing the eclipse through our eclipse glasses.

We noticed that it felt cooler than we would have expected on a sunny day – the sun wasn’t warming us like we’d expect.  And it was dimmer than we would have expected as well.

It was really cool to see the sun change from a u shape to a c shape.

When we neared annularity, I took a bunch of extra pictures, trying to capture the Baily’s Beads effect where the Moon’s terrain breaks up the light of the sun into segments as the terrain blocks the light in some directions but not others.  When we reached annularity, I also tried to get a good ring of fire picture.

With a long time for annularity (over four and a half minutes), I also spent some time looking at cool shadows and just looking (with my eclipse glasses) at the sun as an o shape.  An amazing sight!

After annularity, we enjoyed seeing the sun come back out and feeling it get warm.

What a spectacular day!

Did you get to see the eclipse this year?  Are you planning on seeing the total eclipse that also crosses Texas next year?

Camera geek info for solar pictures:

  • Canon EOS 60D in manual mode, 1/200 second exposure, ISO 100
  • Intervalometer
  • Williams Optics Zenith Star 73 III APO telescope
  • Williams Optics Flat 73A
  • Thousand Oaks optical solar filter
  • Sky-Watcher SolarQuest HelioFind tracking mount and tripod

The Eastern Veil Nebula: A Giant Space Comma and a Space Cow

I call this picture The Giant Space Comma.  It’s generally called the Eastern Veil Nebula and cataloged as Caldwell 33.  It is one side of a supernova remnant called the Cygnus Loop.  The supernova occurred 10,000 – 20,000 years ago, and our distant ancestors would have been able to see it in the daytime.  It is 2400 light years away from us, and the whole loop has a radius of 65 light years and is expanding.  

Part of the nebula looks like a cow’s head to me.  Can you see it?  I call it the Space Cow.

The images above show what happened as I added data to the image.  The first one is my favorite version, with 3 nights and 12.1 hours of data, followed by the results from 1 night and 3.2 hours of data, the results from 2 nights and 7.45 hours of data, and 4 nights and 16.1 hours of data.  Which do you like best?

I think of all the astroimages I have made so far, this one is the most amazing.  

I’m looking forward to finding more cool things in the sky!

Camera geek info:

  • Canon EOS 60D in manual mode, 1 minute exposure, ISO 800
  • Intervalometer
  • Williams Optics Zenith Star 73 III APO telescope
  • Williams Optics Flat 73A
  • SkyTech 2” LPRO-MAX CCD Filter
  • iOptron CEM40
  • Friendswood, Texas Bortle 7-8 suburban skies

Frames:

  • August 17, 2023
    • Run 1 
      • 194 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
  • August 18, 2023 
    • Run 2
      • 86 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
    • Run 3
      • 167 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 31 0.03 second flat darks
  • August 26, 2023
    • Run 4
      • 278 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
  • August 30, 2023 
    • Run 5
      • 103 1 minute lights
      • 32 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
    • Run 6
      • 137 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks

Processing geek info:

  • PixInsight
  • BlurXterminator
  • NoiseXterminator
  • StarXTerminator
  • Generalized Hyperbolic Stretch

IC1318 Gamma Cygni Nebula – Butterfly Nebula

This is a portion of IC1318 the Gamma Cygni Nebula nicknamed the Butterfly Nebula.  It’s in the constellation Cygnus beyond the star Gamma Cygni from which it gets its name.  IC1318 is an emission nebula and consists of three bright areas labeled A, B, and C – the butterfly is formed by B and C (A is not in this picture). It is 3700 light years away from us and has apparent dimensions of 50 (B) and 40 (C) arcmin. 

In the lower right corner of the picture is NGC6910, a cluster of stars made in this nebula.  The cluster is 13 million years old.

This is 13.7 hours of data take over three nights.

As you may note from my run numbers starting at 3, my first two runs did not align well with the rest or with the nebula, so I ended up not using them.  This is a tricky bit about imaging objects that are large compared to the total imaging area – the orientation of the camera and how well the imaging runs align with one another makes a difference.

For this particular image, I tried processing the nebula and stars separately, but I was not happy with the results, so I ended up processing them together.  

I think the Butterfly Nebula really looks like a butterfly.  How about you?  But I also think I see … a dark chicken?  What do you think?

Camera geek info:

  • Canon EOS 60D in manual mode, 1 minute exposure, ISO 800
  • Williams Optics Zenith Star 73 III APO telescope
  • Williams Optics Flat 73A
  • SkyTech 2” LPRO-MAX CCD Filter
  • iOptron CEM40
  • Friendswood, Texas Bortle 7-8 suburban skies

Frames:

  • September 21, 2023
    • Run 3 
      • 320 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
  • September 22, 2023
    • Run 4
      • 240 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
  • September 23, 2023 
    • Run 5
      • 28 1 minute lights
      • 30 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
    • Run 6
      • 235 1 minute lights
      • 29 0.03 second flats
      • 30 0.03 second flat darks
  • 30 1 minute darks

Processing geek info:

  • PixInsight
  • BlurXterminator
  • NoiseXterminator
  • Generalized Hyperbolic Stretch